Sunday, July 5, 2009

The Trouble With Liberals

I just can’t help ragging on Liberals. True, there are those Liberals among my family and friends who are people I dearly love and who I’m pretty sure love me. (At least up ‘til this post.) But, the rest I find annoying, shallow, arrogant and obsequious ideologues. You know the type of Liberals I mean- - -the Al Franken, John Stewart, Bill Maher, Janine Garofalo, Susan Sarandon, Sean Penn, Wesley Clark, Al Gore, Al Sharpton, Howard Dean, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Bill Moyers, Caroline Kennedy, Jesse Jackson, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, John Edwards, Keith Olberman, Gavin Newsom, George Soros, Seymour Hersh, Rob Reiner, Arianna Huffington, Molly Ivins, Bill Clinton, George Stephanopoulos, Harry Reid, Jerry Brown and Janet Napolitano types, to name just a few. If you read what they write, watch their TV programs, see their movies, parse their speeches and scrutinize their behaviors it doesn’t take long to figure out these people are all bothersome and arrogantly think they are inherently “better” than Conservatives.

Have you ever heard any of the folks mentioned above ever imply that “Conservative” is anything other than another name for a red-necked, Bible thumping, racist, sexist, hate mongering, planet polluting, greed worshipping, pedophilic, dim-witted oaf? Think I’m wrong? Read the comments made by the readers of The Huffington Post on a daily basis for a week and you’ll see far worse vitriol than this hurled at Conservatives by those peace-loving, let’s all get along, we are the world, hold hands and sing Kumbaya, Liberals.

Now just in case there are any Liberals still reading this, let me point out a few of the specific things that Conservatives find irksome about you.

You seem to have a lot of terms that have only one, very strict, definition. Take “Racism” for example. You appear to think it strictly means “white men taking advantage of people of color.” To you it can’t possibly be a two-way-street even though the Supreme Court thinks otherwise. Or “Sexism” which, when I hear you speak, seems to be a problem every time a woman gets passed over for a promotion or appointment that went to man - -regardless of the circumstances. To you it is unfathomable that a woman may simply have been lacking in base skills or credentials because the Feminists have told you so and they wouldn’t lie.

Then there are the self described “Intellectuals”- - the true arrogants among you- - the Liberal teachers and professors that dominate the faculties of most high schools and colleges in the US and science labs everywhere. If only the rest of us were as enlightened as you are the world would be a better place. You are quick to spread liberal ideology and theory and quick to embrace the science of the day. Yet, you attempt to shut off all debate by proclaiming the latest theory to be “settled science”. Let me give you one astounding example of how arrogant you can be when it comes to this sort of debate.

When we finally got computers with enough power to handle the complex calculations involved in deconstructing the human genome it was widely reported as “settled science” that humans and chimps share 97% of their DNA. Let me repeat the implication of that statement: except for a 3% variance, humans and chimps would be the same. Now folks let me see if I’ve got this right. Except for a scant 3% differential in our shared DNA chimps would be; doing math, devising languages, writing poetry, making movies, inventing new devices, designing space craft, constructing bridges, erecting buildings, performing complex surgeries, playing football, cooking gourmet meals, penning self-help books, piloting airplanes, driving cars, feeding the poor among themselves and keeping up with their friends on Facebook- -is that correct? Does that make sense to you? Does that “smell” right to you? Is that where the debate ends? Did it ever occur to you that your computer models could be wrong? Did you ever think that perhaps DNA is not the ultimate building block, that it might be something smaller yet with a much greater base which would explain why no one in their lucid mind would observe that a chimp is 97% the same as a human. Oh yeah, I forgot. It’s “settled science”.

So, dear Liberals are you beginning to get the idea why so many folks don’t like you? It’s because you think- - -no, you believe- -that you are morally and intellectually superior to everyone else, especially Conservatives. Take a close look at the 30 names I mentioned in the first paragraph- - noted Liberals all. Does that seem like a morally and intellectually superior group to you? If it does then you are a true-believer. Enjoy your Kool-Aid.



ALL POLITE DEBATE AND VARYING POINTS OF VIEW ARE ENCOURAGED AND WELCOMED. PLEASE USE THE “COMMENT” LINK BELOW TO OFFER YOUR THOUGHTS

7 comments:

katsnips said...

Once again, the Sage has hit the nail on the head. Of course, the term "liberal" is a complete misnomer. Webster's defines liberal as "not narrow in opinion or judgement; broad-minded"--hardly describes the arrogant, narrow minded "liberals" of today who are completely incapable of thinking outside of the box or considering the opinions of others.
Thanks, Sage. You've made my day.

The Sage of Tampa said...

Anytime Kat, anytime. It's great fun exposing these people for what they are which is anything but broad minded and accepting of other points of view at odds with their own. Yet, you have to admire their ability to consistently and smuggly ignore facts without a moment's worth of reflection or self doubt.

Anonymous said...

Sage I'm so tired of guys like you. You Conservatives are all just greedy out of touch MFers and haters. I hope some Liberal half your size kicks your fat Republican ass!!

The Sage of Tampa said...

Dear "Tired":

I hope some Liberal TWICE my size tries! I'm not much for turning the other cheek.

Thanx for your warm thoughts.

JULES said...

I wholeheartedly agree with you. The 3% is a unique way of thinking about the difference between humans and chimps. Some liberals don't have the 3% or might I say the power of deductive reasoning.
The "RACISM" word is and should be used for Liberals versus Conservatives. Race meaning any geographical population sharing the same habits, ideas,ect..
Liberals thinking that their way is the "right" way and the only way is racism. Simple.
I am a conservative and I'll keep thumping my Bible and waving my gun until it is pryed from my dead hands. I like my freedom. It seems as though Liberals want to decide for us which freedoms we should have. WRONG!!!
POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!

Anonymous said...

Addressing Tired,
Typical!!

The Sage of Tampa said...

Why are you Liberals always "anonymous". Don't you have the courage of your convictions? Oh, and thanx, sis.